wow. im missing so much. i usually browse through the games showcase, read the online part and then im off. i just found this discussion.
about missing feedback:
lets me honest: some showcases don’t show much. they have a jnlp link, a short description and are simply not asking for specific feedback. if graphics are crappy, but intentionally temporary, i want to know that before i post! i don’t want to say “improve the visuals” if it’s just coders art. i rarely see a description of how complete the game is or what’s intended to follow! some people don’t like to install, just to see what’s happening, if anything. i tend to give feedback on interesting games, which is subjective. i don’t like tower-defense that much.
if you want to get better feedback, make sure to offer something and ask for some kind of help. let us know how you reflect your efforts and what you want to achieve.
also, jgo is not a feedback community for games for me. it is a limited audience in the first place (coders of java) and that limits the feedback more. don’t expect too much, id say.
about updates on the same game: if there are too many and the differences get blurred or minimal, people won’t test again because of “new title image”, e.g… bigger updates should get their own post maybe. close the old thread and re-start the feedback getting with new questions. it’s hard to follow through 15 pages of posts and follow the intention of the developer.
ideas:
- there should definitely be a guide, how to post showcases!
- encourage to post versions in different posts (with version in title, close old)
- maybe add a system to give quick-feedback in form of a survey?
the latter idea would be to have each showcase be accompanied with a survey. those that see the screens or test can give feedback, without writing and the developer has to come up with a few votable questions.
i think blogs would be fine, but maybe they could simply be integrated, not stored/created on jgo? like a RSS feed, where developers could register their blogs and jgo would get the latest posts of some of those on a page?
please: don’t start a wiki. to make this useful, it would be a lot of work and housekeeping. also don’t add more sub-forums. they don’t organize everything by themselfs.
princec: i disagree: we don’t need to focus on the 90% that’s missing. it’s fine to have a page with crappy coders art and all. but it should be about the game idea then or the execution. something that’s worth commenting. if the shown game is just a pacman clone, i don’t want to post lots about it. there are blueprints for those remakes: the originals! my advice: be more realistic maybe. that does not mean you have to say “it’s shit i know”, but something like: “i would like to have better graphics, but i focus on gameplay” or something like that.
jgo is a java game developer community. it’s not an artist community. while it’s nice to get more art in the games and better visuals, that’s simply not the site to attract art-guys. maybe we should communicate where to find game artists though! or we should be fine with coder art.
i like this community. even though im bickering and don’t give feedback =)